further 160914 fix: test for RD=1 and RA=0 also as suggested by ISC and for
ARCOUNT=0 as does glibc
This commit is contained in:
parent
4206716ead
commit
9992df4335
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
--- bind-9.3.1/bin/dig/dighost.c.next_server_on_referral 2005-07-07 13:19:29.000000000 -0400
|
||||
+++ bind-9.3.1/bin/dig/dighost.c 2005-07-07 14:30:38.000000000 -0400
|
||||
@@ -2765,7 +2765,15 @@
|
||||
--- bind-9.3.1/bin/dig/dighost.c.next_server_on_referral 2005-08-16 16:27:33.000000000 -0400
|
||||
+++ bind-9.3.1/bin/dig/dighost.c 2005-08-16 16:27:49.000000000 -0400
|
||||
@@ -2765,7 +2765,17 @@
|
||||
UNLOCK_LOOKUP;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
|
|||
+ &&( (msg->rcode == dns_rcode_servfail)
|
||||
+ ||( (msg->rcode == dns_rcode_noerror)
|
||||
+ &&(msg->counts[DNS_SECTION_ANSWER] == 0)
|
||||
+ &&((msg->flags & (DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_AA | DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_RA)) == 0)
|
||||
+ &&(msg->counts[DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL] == 0)
|
||||
+ &&((msg->flags & DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_RD) == DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_RD)
|
||||
+ &&((msg->flags & (DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_RA | DNS_MESSAGEFLAG_AA)) == 0)
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
|
@ -17,7 +19,7 @@
|
|||
dig_query_t *next = ISC_LIST_NEXT(query, link);
|
||||
if (l->current_query == query)
|
||||
l->current_query = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -2783,9 +2791,11 @@
|
||||
@@ -2783,9 +2793,11 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((ISC_LIST_HEAD(l->q) != query) ||
|
||||
(ISC_LIST_NEXT(query, link) != NULL)) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue