Update to 9.9.1

- bind99-coverity.patch merged
- bind-9.5-overflow.patch merged

Signed-off-by: Adam Tkac <atkac@redhat.com>

.gitignore

@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ bind-9.7.2b1.tar.gz
 /bind-9.9.0rc1.tar.gz
 /bind-9.9.0rc2.tar.gz
 /bind-9.9.0.tar.gz
+/bind-9.9.1.tar.gz

bind-9.5-overflow.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-diff -up bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/pthreads/condition.c.overflow bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/pthreads/condition.c
---- bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/pthreads/condition.c.overflow	2007-07-17 07:53:59.000000000 +0200
-+++ bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/pthreads/condition.c	2007-07-17 07:55:08.000000000 +0200
-@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ isc_condition_waituntil(isc_condition_t 
- 	 * POSIX defines a timespec's tv_sec as time_t.
- 	 */
- 	result = isc_time_secondsastimet(t, &ts.tv_sec);
--	if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS)
-+	if (result != ISC_R_RANGE && result != ISC_R_SUCCESS)
- 		return (result);
- 
- 	/*!
-diff -up bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/unix/time.c.overflow bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/unix/time.c
---- bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/unix/time.c.overflow	2007-02-14 01:27:27.000000000 +0100
-+++ bind-9.5.0a5/lib/isc/unix/time.c	2007-07-17 07:53:08.000000000 +0200
-@@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ isc_time_secondsastimet(const isc_time_t
- 		 * (Let's hope the compiler got the actual test right.)
- 		 */
- 		UNUSED(i);
-+
-+		/* Means that t->seconds > maximum value in time_t and we have int time_t */
-+		seconds = INT_MAX;
- 		return (ISC_R_RANGE);
- 	}

bind.spec

@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
 Summary:  The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server
 Name:     bind
 License:  ISC
-Version:  9.9.0
-Release:  6%{?dist}
+Version:  9.9.1
+Release:  1%{?dist}
 Epoch:    32
 Url:      http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/
 Buildroot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ Source41: setup-named-chroot.sh
 Patch5:  bind-nonexec.patch
 Patch10: bind-9.5-PIE.patch
 Patch16: bind-9.3.2-redhat_doc.patch
-Patch71: bind-9.5-overflow.patch
 Patch72: bind-9.5-dlz-64bit.patch
 Patch87: bind-9.5-parallel-build.patch
 Patch99: bind-96-libtool2.patch
@@ -72,7 +71,6 @@ Patch123:bind98-rh735103.patch
 Patch124:nslookup-norec.patch
 Patch125:bind99-buildfix.patch
 Patch127:bind99-forward.patch
-Patch128:bind99-coverity.patch
 Patch129:bind98-rh816164.patch
 
 # SDB patches
@@ -241,8 +239,6 @@ Based on the code from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
 %patch10 -p1 -b .PIE
 %patch16 -p1 -b .redhat_doc
 %patch104 -p1 -b .dyndb
-%patch128 -p1 -b .coverity
-%patch71 -p1 -b .overflow
 %ifnarch alpha ia64
 %patch72 -p1 -b .64bit
 %endif
@@ -776,6 +772,11 @@ rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}
 %endif
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 24 2012 Adam Tkac <atkac redhat com> 32:9.9.1-1
+- update to 9.9.1
+- bind99-coverity.patch merged
+- bind-9.5-overflow.patch merged
+
 * Mon May 07 2012 Adam Tkac <atkac redhat com> 32:9.9.0-6
 - nslookup: return non-zero exit code when fail to get answer (#816164)
 

bind99-coverity.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-diff -up bind-9.9.0/bin/named/controlconf.c.coverity bind-9.9.0/bin/named/controlconf.c
---- bind-9.9.0/bin/named/controlconf.c.coverity	2012-03-05 13:57:37.665539706 +0100
-+++ bind-9.9.0/bin/named/controlconf.c	2012-03-05 14:15:15.981420790 +0100
-@@ -373,14 +373,9 @@ control_recvmessage(isc_task_t *task, is
- 		if (result == ISC_R_SUCCESS)
- 			break;
- 		isc_mem_put(listener->mctx, secret.rstart, REGION_SIZE(secret));
--		if (result == ISCCC_R_BADAUTH) {
--			/*
--			 * For some reason, request is non-NULL when
--			 * isccc_cc_fromwire returns ISCCC_R_BADAUTH.
--			 */
--			if (request != NULL)
--				isccc_sexpr_free(&request);
--		} else {
-+		/* request can be non-NULL even in failure case */
-+		isccc_sexpr_free(&request);
-+		if (result != ISCCC_R_BADAUTH) {
- 			log_invalid(&conn->ccmsg, result);
- 			goto cleanup;
- 		}

sources

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-9281d0b04f711d28153ba1ab04a54026  bind-9.9.0.tar.gz
+bb37c88f81e03b1d5208d238c6aa51fa  bind-9.9.1.tar.gz
 76857526420dc8e153ad688aeb5a2c4b  config-8.tar.bz2