rpms/asio
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Remove usage of OpenSSL Engine

Browse Source 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslDeprecateEngine

Note:
There is a difference between Fedora and CentOS Stream 10 / RHEL 10:
- in CentOS Stream 10 / RHEL 10, the change is self-contained by the
  'openssl-devel' package itself, which now defines OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE
  in the headers so new application builds don't use engine at all

- in Fedora, the headers containing the OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE definition
  are put into a separate sub-package 'openssl-devel-engine', instead
  of being put into the 'openssl-devel'

More notes (from Yaakov Selkowitz):
- While C10S/RHEL 10 openssl is built with OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE, ELN is not,
  and many packages still need openssl-devel-engine as in F41+ **until that happens**.
  Therefore, the correct conditional at this time is:
  %if 0%{?fedora} >= 41 || 0%{?rhel} >= 11;

- The -devel subpackage should also 'Recommends: openssl-devel-engine'
  with the same conditionals, otherwise every asio-dependent package
  will need to be modified
This commit is contained in:
Michal Schorm 2024-07-22 14:30:59 +02:00
parent f0d1ddce2f
commit 115556d9ec
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
asio.spec
View File

@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: gcc-c++
BuildRequires: make
BuildRequires: openssl-devel
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 41 || 0%{?rhel} >= 11
BuildRequires: openssl-devel-engine
%endif
BuildRequires: perl-generators
%description
@ -27,6 +30,9 @@ modern C++ approach.
%package devel
Summary: Header files for asio
Recommends: openssl-devel
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 41 || 0%{?rhel} >= 11
Recommends: openssl-devel-engine
%endif
Recommends: boost-devel
%description devel