Clarified licensing of DoubleMetaphoneTest.java

This commit is contained in:
Tomas Radej 2013-05-29 14:04:23 +02:00
parent d866d7ebdc
commit 8cf0f92a93
2 changed files with 96 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -3,13 +3,16 @@
Name: apache-%{short_name}
Version: 1.8
Release: 1%{?dist}
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Implementations of common encoders and decoders
Group: Development/Libraries
License: ASL 2.0
License: ASL 2.0 and MIT
URL: http://commons.apache.org/%{base_name}/
Source0: http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/%{base_name}/source/%{short_name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz
# Data in DoubleMetaphoneTest.java originally has an inadmissible license.
# The author gives MIT in e-mail communication.
Source1: aspell-mail.txt
BuildArch: noarch
@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ Obsoletes: jakarta-%{short_name}-javadoc < %{version}-%{release}
%prep
%setup -q -n %{short_name}-%{version}-src
cp %{SOURCE1} aspell-mail.txt
sed -i 's/\r//' RELEASE-NOTES*.txt LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
%build
@ -80,16 +83,19 @@ install -p -m 644 pom.xml %{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP-%{short_name}.pom
%add_maven_depmap JPP-%{short_name}.pom %{short_name}.jar -a "%{short_name}:%{short_name}"
%files
%doc LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt RELEASE-NOTES*
%doc LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt RELEASE-NOTES* aspell-mail.txt
%{_mavendepmapfragdir}/*
%{_mavenpomdir}/*
%{_javadir}/*
%files javadoc
%doc LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
%doc LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt aspell-mail.txt
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
%changelog
* Tue Jun 25 2013 Tomas Radej <tradej@redhat.com> - 1.8-2
- Clarified licensing of DoubleMetaphoneTest.java
* Fri May 03 2013 Mat Booth <fedora@matbooth.co.uk> - 1.8-1
- Update to 1.8, rhbz #957598

85
aspell-mail.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
Return-Path: kevina@misc.kevina.org
Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO
zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by
zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012
08:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])
by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74A71609E2
for <tradej@mail.corp.redhat.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:37:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx15.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.20])
by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7LCbx5d031748
for <tradej@redhat.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:37:59 -0400
Received: from misc.kevina.org (misc.kevina.org [96.126.107.114])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7LCbwlx024966
for <tradej@redhat.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:37:58 -0400
Received: by misc.kevina.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 576F124ED81; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:37:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kevin Atkinson <k@kevina.org>
X-X-Sender: kevina@misc.kevina.org
To: Tomas Radej <tradej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Aspell results licensing
In-Reply-To: <20120821095056.266cfca47594ad0e03f332f8@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208211423550.7113@misc.kevina.org>
References: <20120816110627.3b433e1e1a2cfa2a3c29f8e2@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208162006450.14875@misc.kevina.org> <20120821095056.266cfca47594ad0e03f332f8@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -2.111 (BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.110.20
How's this:
Copyright 2007 by Kevin Atkinson
Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell the file
batch0.tab (available at http://aspell.net/test/cur/) is hereby
granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appears
in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission
notice appear in supporting documentation. Kevin Atkinson makes no
representations about the suitability of this array for any
purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
2007 since that is the year I belive I last modified the data. Would 2012 be
better?
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomas Radej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:12:27 +0200 (CEST)
> Kevin Atkinson <kevina@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> If you are using the results than there shouldn't be a problem regardless of
>> what copyright I use.
>
> It's necessary to say that I'm not a maintainer in that project, I
> simply package it into Fedora.
>
>> If the original data file will some how be distributed
>> please let me know what your requirements are and I will see about
>> explicitly
>> assigning a compatible copyright.
>
> While checking the package, I found out that some of the data are
> actually embedded in the code [1], so yes, your data is actually being
> distributed. If I may, I would suggest you use either the MIT/X11
> licence or the 2 or 3 clause BSD licence, as both of these can be
> combined with both the ASL 2.0 licence and GPL v2+ [2].
>
> Thank you, TR
>
> [1]
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/codec/language/DoubleMetaphoneTest.java?view=markup
> ,
> line 49 onwards
>
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
>
> --
> Tomas Radej <tradej@redhat.com>
>
>