rpms/annobin
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Really enable annocheck sub-package

Browse Source 
Commit 4656334c92 supposedly added
annocheck as a sub-package but is missing the corresponding %files
section, which causes the whole sub-package to be ignored and annocheck
ending up in the main annobin package. Which creates a nasty "bootstrap"
dependency issue for compilation when rpm soname changes.
This commit is contained in:
Panu Matilainen 2019-06-06 11:06:43 +03:00
parent 94317b5194
commit fcc5d2b097
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
annobin.spec
View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Name: annobin Name: annobin
Summary: Binary annotation plugin for GCC Summary: Binary annotation plugin for GCC
Version: 8.76 Version: 8.76
Release: 1%{?dist} Release: 2%{?dist}
License: GPLv3+ License: GPLv3+
URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Watermark URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Watermark
@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ fi
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/run-on-binaries-in.1.gz %doc %{_mandir}/man1/run-on-binaries-in.1.gz
%if %{with annocheck} %if %{with annocheck}
%files annocheck
%{_bindir}/annocheck %{_bindir}/annocheck
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/annocheck.1.gz %doc %{_mandir}/man1/annocheck.1.gz
%endif %endif
@ -213,6 +214,9 @@ fi
#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%changelog %changelog
* Thu Jun 06 2019 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com> - 8.76-2
- Really enable annocheck sub-package
* Tue Apr 30 2019 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> - 8.76-1 * Tue Apr 30 2019 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> - 8.76-1
- Report a missing -D_FORTIFY_SOUCRE option if -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS was detected. (#1703499) - Report a missing -D_FORTIFY_SOUCRE option if -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS was detected. (#1703499)
- Do not report problems with -fstack-protection if the binary was not built by gcc or clang. (#1703788) - Do not report problems with -fstack-protection if the binary was not built by gcc or clang. (#1703788)