Really enable annocheck sub-package
Commit 4656334c92
supposedly added
annocheck as a sub-package but is missing the corresponding %files
section, which causes the whole sub-package to be ignored and annocheck
ending up in the main annobin package. Which creates a nasty "bootstrap"
dependency issue for compilation when rpm soname changes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
94317b5194
commit
fcc5d2b097
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
Name: annobin
|
||||
Summary: Binary annotation plugin for GCC
|
||||
Version: 8.76
|
||||
Release: 1%{?dist}
|
||||
Release: 2%{?dist}
|
||||
|
||||
License: GPLv3+
|
||||
URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Watermark
|
||||
@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ fi
|
||||
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/run-on-binaries-in.1.gz
|
||||
|
||||
%if %{with annocheck}
|
||||
%files annocheck
|
||||
%{_bindir}/annocheck
|
||||
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/annocheck.1.gz
|
||||
%endif
|
||||
@ -213,6 +214,9 @@ fi
|
||||
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Thu Jun 06 2019 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com> - 8.76-2
|
||||
- Really enable annocheck sub-package
|
||||
|
||||
* Tue Apr 30 2019 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> - 8.76-1
|
||||
- Report a missing -D_FORTIFY_SOUCRE option if -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS was detected. (#1703499)
|
||||
- Do not report problems with -fstack-protection if the binary was not built by gcc or clang. (#1703788)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user