acpica-tools/facp.patch
Al Stone edb6c78416 Update to upstream 20200925 version
This update also means a major update for all of the big-endian patching
that has been done.  The older mechanism was getting to unwieldy to keep
maintained, and too sensitive to upstream changes.  Hence, redid all of
the old patches, and took the opportunity to make them more amenable to
change over time.  Ultimately, the goal is to have upstream accept these
in some form.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2020-10-19 12:24:09 -06:00

29 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

From 7670c56ebe004e698551635f9c5d48a1794066dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Stone <ahs3@ahs3.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:52:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Correct DSDT Address field in FACP tables
The FADT allows either the DSDT Address or XDSDT Address field to be
zero. However, the table definition used by the table compiler still
requires the DSDT Address to be non-zero, which is not correct. So,
remove the DT_NON_ZERO flag from the field.
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
---
source/common/dmtbinfo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: acpica-unix2-20200925/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
===================================================================
--- acpica-unix2-20200925.orig/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
+++ acpica-unix2-20200925/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ ACPI_DMTABLE_INFO AcpiDmTableI
ACPI_DMTABLE_INFO AcpiDmTableInfoFadt1[] =
{
{ACPI_DMT_UINT32, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Facs), "FACS Address", 0},
- {ACPI_DMT_UINT32, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Dsdt), "DSDT Address", DT_NON_ZERO},
+ {ACPI_DMT_UINT32, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Dsdt), "DSDT Address", 0},
{ACPI_DMT_UINT8, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Model), "Model", 0},
{ACPI_DMT_FADTPM, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (PreferredProfile), "PM Profile", 0},
{ACPI_DMT_UINT16, ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (SciInterrupt), "SCI Interrupt", 0},