rpms/acpica-tools
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
80dc240519
acpica-tools/cve-2017-13694.patch
DistroBaker 80dc240519 Merged update from upstream sources 
This is an automated DistroBaker update from upstream sources.
If you do not know what this is about or would like to opt out,
contact the OSCI team.

Source: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/acpica-tools.git#defe2b64332fc44bf9915c8f57d2614c529cdb43
2020-10-31 12:18:15 +01:00

217 lines
8.5 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 4a0243ecb4c94e2d73510d096c5ea4d0711fc6c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:19:48 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] acpi: acpica: fix acpi parse and parseext cache leaks
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I'm Seunghun Han, and I work for National Security Research Institute of
South Korea.
I have been doing a research on ACPI and found an ACPI cache leak in ACPI
early abort cases.
Boot log of ACPI cache leak is as follows:
[ 0.352414] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
[ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
[ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
[ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
[ 0.356028] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter
[ 0.356799] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281)
[ 0.360215] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-State: Slab cache still has objects
[ 0.360648] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #10
[ 0.361273] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 0.361873] Call Trace:
[ 0.362243] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[ 0.362591] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[ 0.362944] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.363296] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[ 0.363646] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b
[ 0.364000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[ 0.364000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[ 0.364000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[ 0.364000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[ 0.364000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.364000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[ 0.364000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[ 0.364000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[ 0.364000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[ 0.364000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
I analyzed this memory leak in detail. I found that “Acpi-State” cache and
“Acpi-Parse” cache were merged because the size of cache objects was same
slab cache size.
I finally found “Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache were leaked
using SLAB_NEVER_MERGE flag in kmem_cache_create() function.
Real ACPI cache leak point is as follows:
[ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
[ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
[ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
[ 0.361043] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
[ 0.364016] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter
[ 0.365061] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281)
[ 0.368174] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Parse: Slab cache still has objects
[ 0.369332] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8
[ 0.371256] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 0.372000] Call Trace:
[ 0.372000] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[ 0.372000] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x56/0x7b
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[ 0.372000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[ 0.372000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[ 0.372000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.372000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[ 0.372000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[ 0.372000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[ 0.372000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[ 0.372000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[ 0.388039] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-ParseExt: Slab cache still has objects
[ 0.389063] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8
[ 0.390557] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 0.392000] Call Trace:
[ 0.392000] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[ 0.392000] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[ 0.392000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[ 0.392000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[ 0.392000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[ 0.392000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[ 0.392000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[ 0.392000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[ 0.392000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[ 0.392000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
When early abort is occurred due to invalid ACPI information, Linux kernel
terminates ACPI by calling acpi_terminate() function. The function calls
acpi_ut_delete_caches() function to delete local caches (acpi_gbl_namespace_
cache, state_cache, operand_cache, ps_node_cache, ps_node_ext_cache).
But the deletion codes in acpi_ut_delete_caches() function only delete
slab caches using kmem_cache_destroy() function, therefore the cache
objects should be flushed before acpi_ut_delete_caches() function.
“Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache are used in an AML parse
function, acpi_ps_parse_loop(). The function should have flush codes to
handle an error state due to invalid AML codes.
This cache leak has a security threat because an old kernel (<= 4.9) shows
memory locations of kernel functions in stack dump. Some malicious users
could use this information to neutralize kernel ASLR.
To fix ACPI cache leak for enhancing security, I made a patch which has
flush codes in acpi_ps_parse_loop() function.
I hope that this patch improves the security of Linux kernel.
Thank you.
Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Github-Location: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/278/commits/4a0243ecb4c94e2d73510d096c5ea4d0711fc6c0
---
source/components/parser/psobject.c | 44 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Index: acpica-unix2-20200925/source/components/parser/psobject.c
===================================================================
--- acpica-unix2-20200925.orig/source/components/parser/psobject.c
+++ acpica-unix2-20200925/source/components/parser/psobject.c
@@ -707,7 +707,8 @@ AcpiPsCompleteFinalOp (
ACPI_PARSE_OBJECT *Op,
ACPI_STATUS Status)
{
- ACPI_STATUS Status2;
+ ACPI_STATUS ReturnStatus = AE_OK;
+ BOOLEAN Ascending = TRUE;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE_PTR (PsCompleteFinalOp, WalkState);
@@ -724,7 +725,7 @@ AcpiPsCompleteFinalOp (
{
if (Op)
{
- if (WalkState->AscendingCallback != NULL)
+ if (Ascending && WalkState->AscendingCallback != NULL)
{
WalkState->Op = Op;
WalkState->OpInfo = AcpiPsGetOpcodeInfo (Op->Common.AmlOpcode);
@@ -743,41 +744,28 @@ AcpiPsCompleteFinalOp (
if (Status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE)
{
- Status = AE_OK;
-
- /* Clean up */
- do
- {
- if (Op)
- {
- Status2 = AcpiPsCompleteThisOp (WalkState, Op);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status2))
- {
- return_ACPI_STATUS (Status2);
- }
- }
-
- AcpiPsPopScope (&(WalkState->ParserState), &Op,
- &WalkState->ArgTypes, &WalkState->ArgCount);
-
- } while (Op);
-
- return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
+ Ascending = FALSE;
+ ReturnStatus = AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
else if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status))
{
/* First error is most important */
- (void) AcpiPsCompleteThisOp (WalkState, Op);
- return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
+ Ascending = FALSE;
+ ReturnStatus = Status;
}
}
- Status2 = AcpiPsCompleteThisOp (WalkState, Op);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status2))
+ Status = AcpiPsCompleteThisOp (WalkState, Op);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status))
{
- return_ACPI_STATUS (Status2);
+ Ascending = FALSE;
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS (ReturnStatus) ||
+ ReturnStatus == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE)
+ {
+ ReturnStatus = Status;
+ }
}
}
@@ -786,5 +774,5 @@ AcpiPsCompleteFinalOp (
} while (Op);
- return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
+ return_ACPI_STATUS (ReturnStatus);
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink