resync

Signed-off-by: Brian Stinson <bstinson@redhat.com>

.gitignore

@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-SOURCES/Judy-1.0.5.tar.gz
-/Judy-1.0.5.tar.gz
+Judy-1.0.5.tar.gz

README.Fedora

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-Regarding the license, upstream has confirmed that the current license is LGPL
-v2.1 or later.  Also, the source code is really the final say on this, and it
-says "GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software
-Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
-version."  Either way, Fedora spec files don't distinguish between v2.1 and v2,
-so this is specified as LGPLv2+ for the spec file.
-
-"From dougbaskins@yahoo.com  Thu Nov 27 21:45:54 2008
-From: Doug Baskins <dougbaskins@yahoo.com>
-To: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
-Cc: judy-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:45:47 -0800 (PST)
-Subject: Re: Judy license confusion - (LGPL v2.1 or later applies)
-Reply-To: Doug Baskins <dougbaskins@yahoo.com>
-
-Chuck:
-
-I did not know a new version of LGPL existed.  You are correct,
-the COPYING file is correct (LGPL v2.1 or later applies).  I will
-change the README file to reflect that in the next release of Judy.
-..."
-
-- Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu>

gating.yaml

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
---- !Policy
-product_versions:
-  - rhel-9
-decision_context: osci_compose_gate
-rules:
-  - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: osci.brew-build.installability.functional}
-  - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: osci.brew-build.test-compose.integration}
-  - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: osci.brew-build.rpmdeplint.functional}