lethliel/glibc
1
0
Fork 0
forked from rpms/glibc
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
b73861e187
glibc/SOURCES/glibc-rh1871383-1.patch
CentOS Sources b73861e187 import glibc-2.28-225.el8
2023-05-17 01:33:08 +00:00

246 lines
8.9 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From a1a486d70ebcc47a686ff5846875eacad0940e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eyal Itkin <eyalit@checkpoint.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:19:17 +0200
Subject: Add Safe-Linking to fastbins and tcache
Safe-Linking is a security mechanism that protects single-linked
lists (such as the fastbin and tcache) from being tampered by attackers.
The mechanism makes use of randomness from ASLR (mmap_base), and when
combined with chunk alignment integrity checks, it protects the "next"
pointers from being hijacked by an attacker.
While Safe-Unlinking protects double-linked lists (such as the small
bins), there wasn't any similar protection for attacks against
single-linked lists. This solution protects against 3 common attacks:
* Partial pointer override: modifies the lower bytes (Little Endian)
* Full pointer override: hijacks the pointer to an attacker's location
* Unaligned chunks: pointing the list to an unaligned address
The design assumes an attacker doesn't know where the heap is located,
and uses the ASLR randomness to "sign" the single-linked pointers. We
mark the pointer as P and the location in which it is stored as L, and
the calculation will be:
* PROTECT(P) := (L >> PAGE_SHIFT) XOR (P)
* *L = PROTECT(P)
This way, the random bits from the address L (which start at the bit
in the PAGE_SHIFT position), will be merged with LSB of the stored
protected pointer. This protection layer prevents an attacker from
modifying the pointer into a controlled value.
An additional check that the chunks are MALLOC_ALIGNed adds an
important layer:
* Attackers can't point to illegal (unaligned) memory addresses
* Attackers must guess correctly the alignment bits
On standard 32 bit Linux machines, an attack will directly fail 7
out of 8 times, and on 64 bit machines it will fail 15 out of 16
times.
This proposed patch was benchmarked and it's effect on the overall
performance of the heap was negligible and couldn't be distinguished
from the default variance between tests on the vanilla version. A
similar protection was added to Chromium's version of TCMalloc
in 2012, and according to their documentation it had an overhead of
less than 2%.
Reviewed-by: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zacnella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
index f7cd29bc2f..1282863681 100644
--- a/malloc/malloc.c
+++ b/malloc/malloc.c
@@ -327,6 +327,18 @@ __malloc_assert (const char *assertion, const char *file, unsigned int line,
# define MAX_TCACHE_COUNT UINT16_MAX
#endif
+/* Safe-Linking:
+ Use randomness from ASLR (mmap_base) to protect single-linked lists
+ of Fast-Bins and TCache. That is, mask the "next" pointers of the
+ lists' chunks, and also perform allocation alignment checks on them.
+ This mechanism reduces the risk of pointer hijacking, as was done with
+ Safe-Unlinking in the double-linked lists of Small-Bins.
+ It assumes a minimum page size of 4096 bytes (12 bits). Systems with
+ larger pages provide less entropy, although the pointer mangling
+ still works. */
+#define PROTECT_PTR(pos, ptr) \
+ ((__typeof (ptr)) ((((size_t) pos) >> 12) ^ ((size_t) ptr)))
+#define REVEAL_PTR(ptr) PROTECT_PTR (&ptr, ptr)
/*
REALLOC_ZERO_BYTES_FREES should be set if a call to
@@ -2157,12 +2169,15 @@ do_check_malloc_state (mstate av)
while (p != 0)
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (p)))
+ malloc_printerr ("do_check_malloc_state(): " \
+ "unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
/* each chunk claims to be inuse */
do_check_inuse_chunk (av, p);
total += chunksize (p);
/* chunk belongs in this bin */
assert (fastbin_index (chunksize (p)) == i);
- p = p->fd;
+ p = REVEAL_PTR (p->fd);
}
}
@@ -2923,7 +2938,7 @@ tcache_put (mchunkptr chunk, size_t tc_idx)
detect a double free. */
e->key = tcache;
- e->next = tcache->entries[tc_idx];
+ e->next = PROTECT_PTR (&e->next, tcache->entries[tc_idx]);
tcache->entries[tc_idx] = e;
++(tcache->counts[tc_idx]);
}
@@ -2934,9 +2949,11 @@ static __always_inline void *
tcache_get (size_t tc_idx)
{
tcache_entry *e = tcache->entries[tc_idx];
- tcache->entries[tc_idx] = e->next;
+ tcache->entries[tc_idx] = REVEAL_PTR (e->next);
--(tcache->counts[tc_idx]);
e->key = NULL;
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (e)))
+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): unaligned tcache chunk detected");
return (void *) e;
}
@@ -2960,7 +2977,10 @@ tcache_thread_shutdown (void)
while (tcache_tmp->entries[i])
{
tcache_entry *e = tcache_tmp->entries[i];
- tcache_tmp->entries[i] = e->next;
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (e)))
+ malloc_printerr ("tcache_thread_shutdown(): " \
+ "unaligned tcache chunk detected");
+ tcache_tmp->entries[i] = REVEAL_PTR (e->next);
__libc_free (e);
}
}
@@ -3570,8 +3590,11 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes)
victim = pp; \
if (victim == NULL) \
break; \
+ pp = REVEAL_PTR (victim->fd); \
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (pp))) \
+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected"); \
} \
- while ((pp = catomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (fb, victim->fd, victim)) \
+ while ((pp = catomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (fb, pp, victim)) \
!= victim); \
if ((unsigned long) (nb) <= (unsigned long) (get_max_fast ()))
@@ -3583,8 +3606,11 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes)
if (victim != NULL)
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (victim)))
+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
+
if (SINGLE_THREAD_P)
- *fb = victim->fd;
+ *fb = REVEAL_PTR (victim->fd);
else
REMOVE_FB (fb, pp, victim);
if (__glibc_likely (victim != NULL))
@@ -3605,8 +3631,10 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes)
while (tcache->counts[tc_idx] < mp_.tcache_count
&& (tc_victim = *fb) != NULL)
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (tc_victim)))
+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
if (SINGLE_THREAD_P)
- *fb = tc_victim->fd;
+ *fb = REVEAL_PTR (tc_victim->fd);
else
{
REMOVE_FB (fb, pp, tc_victim);
@@ -4196,11 +4224,15 @@ _int_free (mstate av, mchunkptr p, int have_lock)
LIBC_PROBE (memory_tcache_double_free, 2, e, tc_idx);
for (tmp = tcache->entries[tc_idx];
tmp;
- tmp = tmp->next)
+ tmp = REVEAL_PTR (tmp->next))
+ {
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (tmp)))
+ malloc_printerr ("free(): unaligned chunk detected in tcache 2");
if (tmp == e)
malloc_printerr ("free(): double free detected in tcache 2");
/* If we get here, it was a coincidence. We've wasted a
few cycles, but don't abort. */
+ }
}
if (tcache->counts[tc_idx] < mp_.tcache_count)
@@ -4264,7 +4296,7 @@ _int_free (mstate av, mchunkptr p, int have_lock)
add (i.e., double free). */
if (__builtin_expect (old == p, 0))
malloc_printerr ("double free or corruption (fasttop)");
- p->fd = old;
+ p->fd = PROTECT_PTR (&p->fd, old);
*fb = p;
}
else
@@ -4274,7 +4306,8 @@ _int_free (mstate av, mchunkptr p, int have_lock)
add (i.e., double free). */
if (__builtin_expect (old == p, 0))
malloc_printerr ("double free or corruption (fasttop)");
- p->fd = old2 = old;
+ old2 = old;
+ p->fd = PROTECT_PTR (&p->fd, old);
}
while ((old = catomic_compare_and_exchange_val_rel (fb, p, old2))
!= old2);
@@ -4472,13 +4505,17 @@ static void malloc_consolidate(mstate av)
if (p != 0) {
do {
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (p)))
+ malloc_printerr ("malloc_consolidate(): " \
+ "unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
+
unsigned int idx = fastbin_index (chunksize (p));
if ((&fastbin (av, idx)) != fb)
malloc_printerr ("malloc_consolidate(): invalid chunk size");
}
check_inuse_chunk(av, p);
- nextp = p->fd;
+ nextp = REVEAL_PTR (p->fd);
/* Slightly streamlined version of consolidation code in free() */
size = chunksize (p);
@@ -4896,8 +4933,13 @@ int_mallinfo (mstate av, struct mallinfo *m)
for (i = 0; i < NFASTBINS; ++i)
{
- for (p = fastbin (av, i); p != 0; p = p->fd)
+ for (p = fastbin (av, i);
+ p != 0;
+ p = REVEAL_PTR (p->fd))
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (p)))
+ malloc_printerr ("int_mallinfo(): " \
+ "unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
++nfastblocks;
fastavail += chunksize (p);
}
@@ -5437,8 +5479,11 @@ __malloc_info (int options, FILE *fp)
while (p != NULL)
{
+ if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (p)))
+ malloc_printerr ("__malloc_info(): " \
+ "unaligned fastbin chunk detected");
++nthissize;
- p = p->fd;
+ p = REVEAL_PTR (p->fd);
}
fastavail += nthissize * thissize;
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink