Unused patch dropped

openssl-1.1.1-status-request.patch

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-From 93e26cedac20844733d59f33e313880da17fa23a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:43:57 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't send a status_request extension in a
- CertificateRequest message
-
-If a TLSv1.3 server configured to respond to the status_request extension
-also attempted to send a CertificateRequest then it was incorrectly
-inserting a non zero length status_request extension into that message.
-
-The TLSv1.3 RFC does allow that extension in that message but it must
-always be zero length.
-
-In fact we should not be sending the extension at all in that message
-because we don't support it.
-
-Fixes #9767
----
- ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c | 4 ++++
- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c b/ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c
-index e16722cbeb8..1c023fc6c40 100644
---- a/ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c
-+++ b/ssl/statem/extensions_srvr.c
-@@ -1491,6 +1491,10 @@ EXT_RETURN tls_construct_stoc_status_request(SSL *s, WPACKET *pkt,
-                                              unsigned int context, X509 *x,
-                                              size_t chainidx)
- {
-+    /* We don't currently support this extension inside a CertificateRequest */
-+    if (context == SSL_EXT_TLS1_3_CERTIFICATE_REQUEST)
-+        return EXT_RETURN_NOT_SENT;
-+
-     if (!s->ext.status_expected)
-         return EXT_RETURN_NOT_SENT;
-