forked from rpms/libvirt
92 lines
3.3 KiB
Diff
92 lines
3.3 KiB
Diff
From 8521a431d3da3cc360eb8102eda1c0d649f1ecc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
Message-Id: <8521a431d3da3cc360eb8102eda1c0d649f1ecc3@dist-git>
|
|
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
|
|
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:45:45 +0200
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] numa_conf: Properly check for caches in
|
|
virDomainNumaDefValidate()
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
|
|
|
When adding support for HMAT, in f0611fe8830 I've introduced a
|
|
check which aims to validate /domain/cpu/numa/interconnects. As a
|
|
part of that, there is a loop which checks whether all <latency/>
|
|
with @cache attribute refer to an existing cache level. For
|
|
instance:
|
|
|
|
<cpu mode='host-model' check='partial'>
|
|
<numa>
|
|
<cell id='0' cpus='0-5' memory='512000' unit='KiB' discard='yes'>
|
|
<cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
|
|
<size value='8' unit='KiB'/>
|
|
<line value='5' unit='B'/>
|
|
</cache>
|
|
</cell>
|
|
<interconnects>
|
|
<latency initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' value='5'/>
|
|
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
|
|
</interconnects>
|
|
</numa>
|
|
</cpu>
|
|
|
|
This XML defines that accessing L1 cache of node #0 from node #0
|
|
has latency of 5ns.
|
|
|
|
However, the loop was not written properly. Well, the check in
|
|
it, as it was always checking for the first cache in the target
|
|
node and not the rest. Therefore, the following example errors
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
<cpu mode='host-model' check='partial'>
|
|
<numa>
|
|
<cell id='0' cpus='0-5' memory='512000' unit='KiB' discard='yes'>
|
|
<cache level='3' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
|
|
<size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
|
|
<line value='8' unit='B'/>
|
|
</cache>
|
|
<cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
|
|
<size value='8' unit='KiB'/>
|
|
<line value='5' unit='B'/>
|
|
</cache>
|
|
</cell>
|
|
<interconnects>
|
|
<latency initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' value='5'/>
|
|
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
|
|
</interconnects>
|
|
</numa>
|
|
</cpu>
|
|
|
|
This errors out even though it is a valid configuration. The L1
|
|
cache under node #0 is still present.
|
|
|
|
Fixes: f0611fe8830
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
|
|
(cherry picked from commit e41ac71fca309b50e2c8e6ec142d8fe1280ca2ad)
|
|
|
|
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749518
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
|
|
Message-Id: <4bb47f9e97ca097cee1259449da4739b55753751.1602087923.git.mprivozn@redhat.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
|
|
---
|
|
src/conf/numa_conf.c | 2 +-
|
|
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/src/conf/numa_conf.c b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
|
|
index 5a92eb35cc..a20398714e 100644
|
|
--- a/src/conf/numa_conf.c
|
|
+++ b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
|
|
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ virDomainNumaDefValidate(const virDomainNuma *def)
|
|
|
|
if (l->cache > 0) {
|
|
for (j = 0; j < def->mem_nodes[l->target].ncaches; j++) {
|
|
- const virDomainNumaCache *cache = def->mem_nodes[l->target].caches;
|
|
+ const virDomainNumaCache *cache = &def->mem_nodes[l->target].caches[j];
|
|
|
|
if (l->cache == cache->level)
|
|
break;
|
|
--
|
|
2.29.2
|
|
|