115 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			115 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ============
 | |
| Introduction
 | |
| ============
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Linux DRM layer contains code intended to support the needs of
 | |
| complex graphics devices, usually containing programmable pipelines well
 | |
| suited to 3D graphics acceleration. Graphics drivers in the kernel may
 | |
| make use of DRM functions to make tasks like memory management,
 | |
| interrupt handling and DMA easier, and provide a uniform interface to
 | |
| applications.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A note on versions: this guide covers features found in the DRM tree,
 | |
| including the TTM memory manager, output configuration and mode setting,
 | |
| and the new vblank internals, in addition to all the regular features
 | |
| found in current kernels.
 | |
| 
 | |
| [Insert diagram of typical DRM stack here]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Style Guidelines
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| For consistency this documentation uses American English. Abbreviations
 | |
| are written as all-uppercase, for example: DRM, KMS, IOCTL, CRTC, and so
 | |
| on. To aid in reading, documentations make full use of the markup
 | |
| characters kerneldoc provides: @parameter for function parameters,
 | |
| @member for structure members (within the same structure), &struct structure to
 | |
| reference structures and function() for functions. These all get automatically
 | |
| hyperlinked if kerneldoc for the referenced objects exists. When referencing
 | |
| entries in function vtables (and structure members in general) please use
 | |
| &vtable_name.vfunc. Unfortunately this does not yet yield a direct link to the
 | |
| member, only the structure.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Except in special situations (to separate locked from unlocked variants)
 | |
| locking requirements for functions aren't documented in the kerneldoc.
 | |
| Instead locking should be check at runtime using e.g.
 | |
| ``WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(...));``. Since it's much easier to ignore
 | |
| documentation than runtime noise this provides more value. And on top of
 | |
| that runtime checks do need to be updated when the locking rules change,
 | |
| increasing the chances that they're correct. Within the documentation
 | |
| the locking rules should be explained in the relevant structures: Either
 | |
| in the comment for the lock explaining what it protects, or data fields
 | |
| need a note about which lock protects them, or both.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Functions which have a non-\ ``void`` return value should have a section
 | |
| called "Returns" explaining the expected return values in different
 | |
| cases and their meanings. Currently there's no consensus whether that
 | |
| section name should be all upper-case or not, and whether it should end
 | |
| in a colon or not. Go with the file-local style. Other common section
 | |
| names are "Notes" with information for dangerous or tricky corner cases,
 | |
| and "FIXME" where the interface could be cleaned up.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Also read the :ref:`guidelines for the kernel documentation at large <doc_guide>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Documentation Requirements for kAPI
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| All kernel APIs exported to other modules must be documented, including their
 | |
| datastructures and at least a short introductory section explaining the overall
 | |
| concepts. Documentation should be put into the code itself as kerneldoc comments
 | |
| as much as reasonable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Do not blindly document everything, but document only what's relevant for driver
 | |
| authors: Internal functions of drm.ko and definitely static functions should not
 | |
| have formal kerneldoc comments. Use normal C comments if you feel like a comment
 | |
| is warranted. You may use kerneldoc syntax in the comment, but it shall not
 | |
| start with a /** kerneldoc marker. Similar for data structures, annotate
 | |
| anything entirely private with ``/* private: */`` comments as per the
 | |
| documentation guide.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Getting Started
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Developers interested in helping out with the DRM subsystem are very welcome.
 | |
| Often people will resort to sending in patches for various issues reported by
 | |
| checkpatch or sparse. We welcome such contributions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Anyone looking to kick it up a notch can find a list of janitorial tasks on
 | |
| the :ref:`TODO list <todo>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Contribution Process
 | |
| ====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Mostly the DRM subsystem works like any other kernel subsystem, see :ref:`the
 | |
| main process guidelines and documentation <process_index>` for how things work.
 | |
| Here we just document some of the specialities of the GPU subsystem.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Feature Merge Deadlines
 | |
| -----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| All feature work must be in the linux-next tree by the -rc6 release of the
 | |
| current release cycle, otherwise they must be postponed and can't reach the next
 | |
| merge window. All patches must have landed in the drm-next tree by latest -rc7,
 | |
| but if your branch is not in linux-next then this must have happened by -rc6
 | |
| already.
 | |
| 
 | |
| After that point only bugfixes (like after the upstream merge window has closed
 | |
| with the -rc1 release) are allowed. No new platform enabling or new drivers are
 | |
| allowed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means that there's a blackout-period of about one month where feature work
 | |
| can't be merged. The recommended way to deal with that is having a -next tree
 | |
| that's always open, but making sure to not feed it into linux-next during the
 | |
| blackout period. As an example, drm-misc works like that.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Code of Conduct
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| As a freedesktop.org project, dri-devel, and the DRM community, follows the
 | |
| Contributor Covenant, found at: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please conduct yourself in a respectful and civilised manner when
 | |
| interacting with community members on mailing lists, IRC, or bug
 | |
| trackers. The community represents the project as a whole, and abusive
 | |
| or bullying behaviour is not tolerated by the project.
 |