138 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.7 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			138 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.7 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 | |
| 
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| UBI File System
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Introduction
 | |
| ============
 | |
| 
 | |
| UBIFS file-system stands for UBI File System. UBI stands for "Unsorted
 | |
| Block Images". UBIFS is a flash file system, which means it is designed
 | |
| to work with flash devices. It is important to understand, that UBIFS
 | |
| is completely different to any traditional file-system in Linux, like
 | |
| Ext2, XFS, JFS, etc. UBIFS represents a separate class of file-systems
 | |
| which work with MTD devices, not block devices. The other Linux
 | |
| file-system of this class is JFFS2.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To make it more clear, here is a small comparison of MTD devices and
 | |
| block devices.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1 MTD devices represent flash devices and they consist of eraseblocks of
 | |
|   rather large size, typically about 128KiB. Block devices consist of
 | |
|   small blocks, typically 512 bytes.
 | |
| 2 MTD devices support 3 main operations - read from some offset within an
 | |
|   eraseblock, write to some offset within an eraseblock, and erase a whole
 | |
|   eraseblock. Block  devices support 2 main operations - read a whole
 | |
|   block and write a whole block.
 | |
| 3 The whole eraseblock has to be erased before it becomes possible to
 | |
|   re-write its contents. Blocks may be just re-written.
 | |
| 4 Eraseblocks become worn out after some number of erase cycles -
 | |
|   typically 100K-1G for SLC NAND and NOR flashes, and 1K-10K for MLC
 | |
|   NAND flashes. Blocks do not have the wear-out property.
 | |
| 5 Eraseblocks may become bad (only on NAND flashes) and software should
 | |
|   deal with this. Blocks on hard drives typically do not become bad,
 | |
|   because hardware has mechanisms to substitute bad blocks, at least in
 | |
|   modern LBA disks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It should be quite obvious why UBIFS is very different to traditional
 | |
| file-systems.
 | |
| 
 | |
| UBIFS works on top of UBI. UBI is a separate software layer which may be
 | |
| found in drivers/mtd/ubi. UBI is basically a volume management and
 | |
| wear-leveling layer. It provides so called UBI volumes which is a higher
 | |
| level abstraction than a MTD device. The programming model of UBI devices
 | |
| is very similar to MTD devices - they still consist of large eraseblocks,
 | |
| they have read/write/erase operations, but UBI devices are devoid of
 | |
| limitations like wear and bad blocks (items 4 and 5 in the above list).
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a sense, UBIFS is a next generation of JFFS2 file-system, but it is
 | |
| very different and incompatible to JFFS2. The following are the main
 | |
| differences.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * JFFS2 works on top of MTD devices, UBIFS depends on UBI and works on
 | |
|   top of UBI volumes.
 | |
| * JFFS2 does not have on-media index and has to build it while mounting,
 | |
|   which requires full media scan. UBIFS maintains the FS indexing
 | |
|   information on the flash media and does not require full media scan,
 | |
|   so it mounts many times faster than JFFS2.
 | |
| * JFFS2 is a write-through file-system, while UBIFS supports write-back,
 | |
|   which makes UBIFS much faster on writes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS supports on-the-flight compression which makes
 | |
| it possible to fit quite a lot of data to the flash.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly to JFFS2, UBIFS is tolerant of unclean reboots and power-cuts.
 | |
| It does not need stuff like fsck.ext2. UBIFS automatically replays its
 | |
| journal and recovers from crashes, ensuring that the on-flash data
 | |
| structures are consistent.
 | |
| 
 | |
| UBIFS scales logarithmically (most of the data structures it uses are
 | |
| trees), so the mount time and memory consumption do not linearly depend
 | |
| on the flash size, like in case of JFFS2. This is because UBIFS
 | |
| maintains the FS index on the flash media. However, UBIFS depends on
 | |
| UBI, which scales linearly. So overall UBI/UBIFS stack scales linearly.
 | |
| Nevertheless, UBI/UBIFS scales considerably better than JFFS2.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The authors of UBIFS believe, that it is possible to develop UBI2 which
 | |
| would scale logarithmically as well. UBI2 would support the same API as UBI,
 | |
| but it would be binary incompatible to UBI. So UBIFS would not need to be
 | |
| changed to use UBI2
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Mount options
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| (*) == default.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ====================	=======================================================
 | |
| bulk_read		read more in one go to take advantage of flash
 | |
| 			media that read faster sequentially
 | |
| no_bulk_read (*)	do not bulk-read
 | |
| no_chk_data_crc (*)	skip checking of CRCs on data nodes in order to
 | |
| 			improve read performance. Use this option only
 | |
| 			if the flash media is highly reliable. The effect
 | |
| 			of this option is that corruption of the contents
 | |
| 			of a file can go unnoticed.
 | |
| chk_data_crc		do not skip checking CRCs on data nodes
 | |
| compr=none              override default compressor and set it to "none"
 | |
| compr=lzo               override default compressor and set it to "lzo"
 | |
| compr=zlib              override default compressor and set it to "zlib"
 | |
| auth_key=		specify the key used for authenticating the filesystem.
 | |
| 			Passing this option makes authentication mandatory.
 | |
| 			The passed key must be present in the kernel keyring
 | |
| 			and must be of type 'logon'
 | |
| auth_hash_name=		The hash algorithm used for authentication. Used for
 | |
| 			both hashing and for creating HMACs. Typical values
 | |
| 			include "sha256" or "sha512"
 | |
| ====================	=======================================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Quick usage instructions
 | |
| ========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The UBI volume to mount is specified using "ubiX_Y" or "ubiX:NAME" syntax,
 | |
| where "X" is UBI device number, "Y" is UBI volume number, and "NAME" is
 | |
| UBI volume name.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Mount volume 0 on UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ mount -t ubifs ubi0_0 /mnt/ubifs
 | |
| 
 | |
| Mount "rootfs" volume of UBI device 0 to /mnt/ubifs ("rootfs" is volume
 | |
| name)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ mount -t ubifs ubi0:rootfs /mnt/ubifs
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following is an example of the kernel boot arguments to attach mtd0
 | |
| to UBI and mount volume "rootfs":
 | |
| ubi.mtd=0 root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
 | |
| 
 | |
| References
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| UBIFS documentation and FAQ/HOWTO at the MTD web site:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html
 | |
| - http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html
 |