51 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			51 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. _modifyingpatches:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Modifying Patches
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are a subsystem or branch maintainer, sometimes you need to slightly
 | |
| modify patches you receive in order to merge them, because the code is not
 | |
| exactly the same in your tree and the submitters'. If you stick strictly to
 | |
| rule (c) of the developers certificate of origin, you should ask the submitter
 | |
| to rediff, but this is a totally counter-productive waste of time and energy.
 | |
| Rule (b) allows you to adjust the code, but then it is very impolite to change
 | |
| one submitters code and make him endorse your bugs. To solve this problem, it
 | |
| is recommended that you add a line between the last Signed-off-by header and
 | |
| yours, indicating the nature of your changes. While there is nothing mandatory
 | |
| about this, it seems like prepending the description with your mail and/or
 | |
| name, all enclosed in square brackets, is noticeable enough to make it obvious
 | |
| that you are responsible for last-minute changes. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|        Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
 | |
|        [lucky@maintainer.example.org: struct foo moved from foo.c to foo.h]
 | |
|        Signed-off-by: Lucky K Maintainer <lucky@maintainer.example.org>
 | |
| 
 | |
| This practice is particularly helpful if you maintain a stable branch and
 | |
| want at the same time to credit the author, track changes, merge the fix,
 | |
| and protect the submitter from complaints. Note that under no circumstances
 | |
| can you change the author's identity (the From header), as it is the one
 | |
| which appears in the changelog.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Special note to back-porters: It seems to be a common and useful practice
 | |
| to insert an indication of the origin of a patch at the top of the commit
 | |
| message (just after the subject line) to facilitate tracking. For instance,
 | |
| here's what we see in a 3.x-stable release::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Date:   Tue Oct 7 07:26:38 2014 -0400
 | |
| 
 | |
|     libata: Un-break ATA blacklist
 | |
| 
 | |
|     commit 1c40279960bcd7d52dbdf1d466b20d24b99176c8 upstream.
 | |
| 
 | |
| And here's what might appear in an older kernel once a patch is backported::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Date:   Tue May 13 22:12:27 2008 +0200
 | |
| 
 | |
|         wireless, airo: waitbusy() won't delay
 | |
| 
 | |
|         [backport of 2.6 commit b7acbdfbd1f277c1eb23f344f899cfa4cd0bf36a]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Whatever the format, this information provides a valuable help to people
 | |
| tracking your trees, and to people trying to troubleshoot bugs in your
 | |
| tree.
 |