145 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			145 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0)
 | |
| .. [see the bottom of this file for redistribution information]
 | |
| 
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| Bisecting a regression
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document describes how to use a ``git bisect`` to find the source code
 | |
| change that broke something -- for example when some functionality stopped
 | |
| working after upgrading from Linux 6.0 to 6.1.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The text focuses on the gist of the process. If you are new to bisecting the
 | |
| kernel, better follow Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
 | |
| instead: it depicts everything from start to finish while covering multiple
 | |
| aspects even kernel developers occasionally forget. This includes detecting
 | |
| situations early where a bisection would be a waste of time, as nobody would
 | |
| care about the result -- for example, because the problem happens after the
 | |
| kernel marked itself as 'tainted', occurs in an abandoned version, was already
 | |
| fixed, or is caused by a .config change you or your Linux distributor performed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finding the change causing a kernel issue using a bisection
 | |
| ===========================================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| *Note: the following process assumes you prepared everything for a bisection.
 | |
| This includes having a Git clone with the appropriate sources, installing the
 | |
| software required to build and install kernels, as well as a .config file stored
 | |
| in a safe place (the following example assumes '~/prepared_kernel_.config') to
 | |
| use as pristine base at each bisection step; ideally, you have also worked out
 | |
| a fully reliable and straight-forward way to reproduce the regression, too.*
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Preparation: start the bisection and tell Git about the points in the history
 | |
|   you consider to be working and broken, which Git calls 'good' and 'bad'::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      git bisect start
 | |
|      git bisect good v6.0
 | |
|      git bisect bad v6.1
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Instead of Git tags like 'v6.0' and 'v6.1' you can specify commit-ids, too.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Copy your prepared .config into the build directory and adjust it to the
 | |
|    needs of the codebase Git checked out for testing::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      cp ~/prepared_kernel_.config .config
 | |
|      make olddefconfig
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Now build, install, and boot a kernel. This might fail for unrelated reasons,
 | |
|    for example, when a compile error happens at the current stage of the
 | |
|    bisection a later change resolves. In such cases run ``git bisect skip`` and
 | |
|    go back to step 1.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. Check if the functionality that regressed works in the kernel you just built.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If it works, execute::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      git bisect good
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If it is broken, run::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      git bisect bad
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Note, getting this wrong just once will send the rest of the bisection
 | |
|    totally off course. To prevent having to start anew later you thus want to
 | |
|    ensure what you tell Git is correct; it is thus often wise to spend a few
 | |
|    minutes more on testing in case your reproducer is unreliable.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    After issuing one of these two commands, Git will usually check out another
 | |
|    bisection point and print something like 'Bisecting: 675 revisions left to
 | |
|    test after this (roughly 10 steps)'. In that case go back to step 1.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    If Git instead prints something like 'cafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0da
 | |
|    is the first bad commit', then you have finished the bisection. In that case
 | |
|    move to the next point below. Note, right after displaying that line Git will
 | |
|    show some details about the culprit including its patch description; this can
 | |
|    easily fill your terminal, so you might need to scroll up to see the message
 | |
|    mentioning the culprit's commit-id.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    In case you missed Git's output, you can always run ``git bisect log`` to
 | |
|    print the status: it will show how many steps remain or mention the result of
 | |
|    the bisection.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Recommended complementary task: put the bisection log and the current .config
 | |
|   file aside for the bug report; furthermore tell Git to reset the sources to
 | |
|   the state before the bisection::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      git bisect log > ~/bisection-log
 | |
|      cp .config ~/bisection-config-culprit
 | |
|      git bisect reset
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Recommended optional task: try reverting the culprit on top of the latest
 | |
|   codebase and check if that fixes your bug; if that is the case, it validates
 | |
|   the bisection and enables developers to resolve the regression through a
 | |
|   revert.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   To try this, update your clone and check out latest mainline. Then tell Git
 | |
|   to revert the change by specifying its commit-id::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      git revert --no-edit cafec0cacaca0
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Git might reject this, for example when the bisection landed on a merge
 | |
|   commit. In that case, abandon the attempt. Do the same, if Git fails to revert
 | |
|   the culprit on its own because later changes depend on it -- at least unless
 | |
|   you bisected a stable or longterm kernel series, in which case you want to
 | |
|   check out its latest codebase and try a revert there.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   If a revert succeeds, build and test another kernel to check if reverting
 | |
|   resolved your regression.
 | |
| 
 | |
| With that the process is complete. Now report the regression as described by
 | |
| Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Additional reading material
 | |
| ---------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The `man page for 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect>`_ and
 | |
|   `fighting regressions with 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect-lk2009.html>`_
 | |
|   in the Git documentation.
 | |
| * `Working with git bisect <https://nathanchance.dev/posts/working-with-git-bisect/>`_
 | |
|   from kernel developer Nathan Chancellor.
 | |
| * `Using Git bisect to figure out when brokenness was introduced <http://webchick.net/node/99>`_.
 | |
| * `Fully automated bisecting with 'git bisect run' <https://lwn.net/Articles/317154>`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ..
 | |
|    end-of-content
 | |
| ..
 | |
|    This document is maintained by Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>. If
 | |
|    you spot a typo or small mistake, feel free to let him know directly and
 | |
|    he'll fix it. You are free to do the same in a mostly informal way if you
 | |
|    want to contribute changes to the text -- but for copyright reasons please CC
 | |
|    linux-doc@vger.kernel.org and 'sign-off' your contribution as
 | |
|    Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst explains in the section 'Sign
 | |
|    your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin'.
 | |
| ..
 | |
|    This text is available under GPL-2.0+ or CC-BY-4.0, as stated at the top
 | |
|    of the file. If you want to distribute this text under CC-BY-4.0 only,
 | |
|    please use 'The Linux kernel development community' for author attribution
 | |
|    and link this as source:
 | |
|    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst
 | |
| 
 | |
| ..
 | |
|    Note: Only the content of this RST file as found in the Linux kernel sources
 | |
|    is available under CC-BY-4.0, as versions of this text that were processed
 | |
|    (for example by the kernel's build system) might contain content taken from
 | |
|    files which use a more restrictive license.
 |